<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook &amp; The Tyranny Of Attention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mindshareworld.com/2010/07/facebook-the-tyranny-of-attention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mindshareworld.com/2010/07/facebook-the-tyranny-of-attention/</link>
	<description>Musings on the changing world of digital media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 00:20:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ciarán Norris</title>
		<link>http://blog.mindshareworld.com/2010/07/facebook-the-tyranny-of-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-1244</link>
		<dc:creator>Ciarán Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 09:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mindshareworld.com/?p=1434#comment-1244</guid>
		<description>I think that Twitter is actually very different to Facebook&#039;s status update system (and of course, that is why Facebook made the changes to its system that it did).

Twitter is a way of having conversations, searching for information, browsing for news - I describe it as being &#039;just&#039; a communication tool, but of course so is the phone, and that&#039;s a pretty powerful piece of equipment.

Interestingly, nearly all of Twitter&#039;s competitors in the micro-blogging world (plurk, Jaiku, Pownce) have either gone bust or stalled in terms of growth. 

The tyranny of attention applies in nearly every sector, and this post could have just as easily been about the challenge of trying to listen to music on mFlow, Spotify and blip.fm, or how there&#039;s even only room for one 140 character update service in our lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Twitter is actually very different to Facebook&#8217;s status update system (and of course, that is why Facebook made the changes to its system that it did).</p>
<p>Twitter is a way of having conversations, searching for information, browsing for news &#8211; I describe it as being &#8216;just&#8217; a communication tool, but of course so is the phone, and that&#8217;s a pretty powerful piece of equipment.</p>
<p>Interestingly, nearly all of Twitter&#8217;s competitors in the micro-blogging world (plurk, Jaiku, Pownce) have either gone bust or stalled in terms of growth. </p>
<p>The tyranny of attention applies in nearly every sector, and this post could have just as easily been about the challenge of trying to listen to music on mFlow, Spotify and blip.fm, or how there&#8217;s even only room for one 140 character update service in our lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie</title>
		<link>http://blog.mindshareworld.com/2010/07/facebook-the-tyranny-of-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-1241</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mindshareworld.com/?p=1434#comment-1241</guid>
		<description>Great article!  I agree with you for the most part but was wondering what you think of twitter?  its still pretty popular even though facebook has a status function which is basically the same thing as twitter.  thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article!  I agree with you for the most part but was wondering what you think of twitter?  its still pretty popular even though facebook has a status function which is basically the same thing as twitter.  thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

